check this out:
1. Go to the list that is lacking the link
2. Select the view that doesn’t have the link appearing
3. Select Edit Page from the Site Action menu
4. Edit the list web part properties
5. Note the current Toolbar setting
6. Change the Toolbar setting and click Apply. Any selection other than No Toolbar should cause ...
How about using paging with the 'old' listdata.svc? It supports paging with the ODATA skip and top parameters like so:
Then you can pull e.g. 10,000 items at a time and iterate over the list contents. This is supported in SharePoint 2010, 2013 and Online.
If you don't want to use the GUID, you'll have to make an extra call and get the vti_listname property from the list folder. The folder you can get by url using the getFolderByServerRelativeUrl on the SP.Web object.
var clientContext = SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var web = clientContext.get_web();
var folder = web....
Make sure that the column you include in the where clause is defined as an indexed column in SharePoint. You can check by going to the list you're querying and into List -> Settings -> Indexed Columns. It's not applicable in your CAML query, but if you have more than one 'where', ensuring the first where hits an indexed column can increase efficiency.
SPWeb.Lists.Count.ToString(); is correct way to find number of Lists for any SPWeb. You might be seeing in difference in count you see here and in Site is because SharePoint has couple of hidden list like UserInformation list, managed metadata list which are hidden from UI. Also we can hide our custom list by using powershell/server side code.
To give an ...
When you call SPList.Items.Add() it will fetch all list items through an SPQuery. This can be very costly when you have a considerable amount of items.
public SPListItemCollection Items
[ClientCallableExceptionConstraint(FixedId = "c", ErrorType = typeof(SPQueryThrottledException), Condition = "There is a throttle ...
Using SPList.Items property is bad practice. Each time the property is accessed, it requests all items with all fields from database. Instead you should always use SPList.GetItems().
SPList.GetItems(params string) - you can use it to load only the fields that you need. As far as I remember it'll only return items in the root folder of the list.
1)Select Edit Page from the Site Action menu
2) Edit the list web part properties
3)settings window opens and change the Toolbar type to "Full Toolbar" which can be seen in the dropdown.
click ok and click stop editing on the top of the page .
you can see "add new item" link button.
No, as you can see from the msdn documentation, the SPList object does not have a "Property Bag" property.
That said, if you need to, a common workaround is using the property bag of the root folder of the list as a surrogate. You see... SPFolder does define a property bag. Also you can take for granted that a (normal) list or document library should have a ...
If you want to get the collection of "field_name + field_value", you can try:
var fieldValues = currentItem.get_fieldValues();
It returns an object, the object key is field name and the object value is field value.
MONTH( [MyDate] ) will return 1 for January,
then use the SharePoint version of the switch/case statement:
=CHOOSE( MONTH([MyDate]) , 30 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 , 60 )
All SharePoint functions: www.viewmaster365.com/functions
If both lists are same, you can use SharePoint designer workflow to copy list item from one list to other.
Below link may help you to get started:
This is because of the SPWeb.Lists.Count.ToString(); return the number of all lists and libraries not only lists
To can get the accurate number of lists only you should exclude the library and other list types from your code as the following
foreach (SPList list in Web.Lists)
if (!list.Hidden & list.BaseType != ...
While the other two answers here are correct in that it is fairly straightforward to hide the fields conditionally based on the Title value, what I think is going to be more of a problem for you is that you say that when all 6 fields are shown, they are all required.
This presents a problem, because if you make them required fields in the list, if you hide ...
I have seen other posts where users claim that SPList.Hidden is somehow different from SharePoint Designer's option Hide from browser.
It is my belief that both the code approach and the designer setting are one and the same.
A hidden list does not appear on the Documents and Lists page, Quick
Launch bar, the Modify Site Content page, or the Add Column ...
You can try following:
foreach (SPListItem item in query)
SPListItem newItem = list.Items.Add();
foreach (SPField field in list.Fields)
newItem[field.Id] = item[field.Id];
Your code is fine.
Url is property of the item and its not affected by your parameter in GetItems.
Test with a field (not property) that is not included in the parameter you pass in GetItems.
Normally it should throw an exception (ArgumentException).
When you request list items via client object model, the object will return a number of parameters even if you specify none at all. Some of these include title, url, modified date, created date, check out user, etc. You can see these by storing the object as a variable and then using Dev tools to debug the page. You will see there are actually about a dozen ...
Like to note that RootFolder as you point out yourself is not a bad idea if you were to use REST (and not jsom), like this:
/_api/Web/Lists?$filter=RootFolder/Name eq 'MyImages'
Then just pick the first one, and you get one result with all additional list data.
(Syntax tested on 365, might need $expand on-premise.)
I've used code like this in a console app where I was reconfiguring some lists. This enables versioning and sets limits.
var depts = web.Lists.TryGetList("Depts");
if (depts != null)
depts.EnableModeration = true;
depts.EnableVersioning = true;
As @Evariste and @Eric mentioned in comments:
CAML Query is case-insensitive.
The solution was to filter the results from
SPListItemCollection queryResultItems = docTypeList.GetItems(query);
and check for case-sensitive.
I created a small method which does this.
private SPListItem FindCaseSensitive(string documentType, IEnumerable items)
Try adding web.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true; before for loop and then after for loop add web.AllowUnsafeUpdates = false;
So the code will be:
using (SPSite site = new SPSite(siteUrl))
using (SPWeb web = site.OpenWeb())
web.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;