So I get why breaking inheritance copies over the limited access to sites/items from the parent site. I'm under the assumption that this process of copying over limited access is sometimes completely pointless because users may have access to one list or even list item and that is separate from the list that is getting it's inheirtance broken. So the limited access entries for the permission of that list is just noise, and has no relevance to the list permission base at hand.
Is this by design? Can someone explain why it's this way?
It is different from this thread here because I'm asking the purpose of copying limited access from the parent site to a broken inheritance list that isn't related.
List A -broken
List C -being broken
User 1 - Access to List A
List C permissions copy over limited access from parent for access to List A, and isn't relevant to List C, isn't this just noise?