0

I have a workflow that I created using the 2013 platform on SharePoint Designer. It was suggested to be to create another workflow to perform email notifications and add it in to check a field to see if it is filled.

I have only used the interop bridge to run a 2010 workflow on the 2013 platform and this was successful. When I go to insert the 2013 workflow, I add the action "Start a List Workflow" and the only option I get is for 2010. (See image)

Start a List Workflow

Am I missing a component or is it possible to run a 2013 workflow within another 2013 workflow???

I am using SharePoint Online, so the Workflow Manager should already be configured.

(Added snippet of current parallel block with "on change" action) enter image description here

3

The "Start a List Workflow" and "Start a Site Workflow" is specific to the SharePoint 2010 engine, not SharePoint 2013. Take a look here: https://dev.office.com/sharepoint/docs/general-development/workflow-actions-quick-reference-sharepoint-workflow-platform

If you need to trigger another SharePoint 2013 workflow, I suggest you have another workflow tied to "On Change" and have that workflow look for a specific column that the first workflow updates (and is possibly hidden from the user).

  • That's what I was thinking, so thanks for confirming it. I have added a screen capture of one part of my workflow where I use a parallel block with a "wait for change in field". The email notification part would need to check to see if the field was completed after a couple of days, and if not, send an email. The current parallel block simply looks to see if it is "Approved" or "Rejected" and then proceeds from there. – cbbrown Jun 5 '17 at 17:54
  • Is that a different question? – Mike Jun 5 '17 at 19:06
  • Maybe. LOL. I'm trying not to confuse myself, much less you. I guess I was saying and showing you what I did above to show you that the workflow is already waiting for a change in the item. I want the email notification to only happen if the field is left unanswered 5 days after its assigned. But I don't want it to totally hold up the workflow. Does that make sense? I'm trying to figure out if this is doable. – cbbrown Jun 5 '17 at 19:47
  • Add another Step that uses the action Pause until 5 days – Mike Jun 5 '17 at 20:03
  • 1
    not if it's running in parallel with the 2 steps, but since it's not approved or rejected, you will have to handle what to do after a 5 day unanswered mark. – Mike Jun 5 '17 at 20:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.