Timeline for Showing the latest content added to a site
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/ with https://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 5, 2011 at 9:19 | comment | added | Vedran Rasol | Sorry, since I didn't do any serious work on 2007 for year or even more and I forgot most of it :) I have included some more info in my answer - hope it helps. Btw if someone presented me this request I would instantly start developing custom web part with SPSiteDataQuery | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 9:12 | history | edited | Vedran Rasol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 333 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2011 at 8:56 | comment | added | dmce | Your links are specific to 2010 Verdan. The problem with the CQWP in 2007 is that (as far as im aware) you cannot filter by [Today]-1 for example. I cannot create calculated columns on every list/library. | |
| Oct 5, 2011 at 8:27 | vote | accept | dmce | ||
| Oct 3, 2011 at 12:55 | comment | added | Vedran Rasol | You need to be careful when running queries against whole site collection (performance issue). IMO using it for aggregation of just one content type and with time span filter should be ok. However it really depends on your specific requirements and amount of data you are querying. There is no other or better solution - even if you develop custom web part you will again face same problems with speed, performance... If you have 'tons of items' you can use one CQWP per site (or some other kind of grouping like for several sub sites) and not just one CQWP for entire site collection. | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 12:10 | comment | added | dmce | Im happy customising CQWP and DVWP, and had considered this. I Wasnt sure how much of a negative impact it would have if it was looking at every single item that exists on the site. | |
| Oct 3, 2011 at 11:28 | history | answered | Vedran Rasol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |