Timeline for No Sort/Group by Content Type? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2017 at 21:31 | comment | added | Eric Alexander | The why and how isn't something known to us, there isn't any way to corroborate if it is true. So I might think it is because of reason x, you Bill might think it's because reason Y, and unless the asker has intimate knowledge of how and why SharePoint was developed the way it was, how can they award a proper answer? If you rephrase the question to ask specifically how to hack in the fix, then that is answerable. | |
| Jan 19, 2017 at 19:33 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 19, 2017 at 21:27 | |||||
| Jan 19, 2017 at 19:22 | history | edited | Dan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited to reflect this is NOT an opinion question, changed the title to be less opinion-y.
|
| Jan 19, 2017 at 19:20 | comment | added | Dan | This question may have some degree of subjectivity, but it is not against the community guidelines. This question asks for information about specific SharePoint architecture decisions, and for work-arounds to a limitation to Views. It 'inspire[s] answers that explain “why” and “how”'. | |
| Jan 19, 2017 at 19:16 | history | edited | Dan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited to reflect this is NOT an opinion question.
|
| Jan 19, 2017 at 6:59 | history | closed |
Gautam Sheth Robert Lindgren |
Opinion-based | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 21:32 | answer | added | Chris G | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 21:16 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 19, 2017 at 6:59 | |||||
| Jan 18, 2017 at 20:45 | history | edited | Dan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added 'sort' to the question, instead of just 'group'
|
| Jan 18, 2017 at 19:53 | history | asked | Dan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |