Timeline for SP2010 minimum hardware req on vSphere
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014 at 6:12 | vote | accept | Peter | ||
| Oct 16, 2014 at 6:12 | comment | added | Peter | Ok. SP has minimum hardware requirement but then also recommended guidelines for hardware depending on load, with those statements I was thinking that the requirements is a baseline whereas the guidelines could be seen as excessive. Anyway, thanks | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 6:06 | comment | added | Robert Lindgren | That's how I read it, and also how I practice it with my clients. If the server is able to cope up with the load with less then minimum resources - give it as much as it needs | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 6:05 | comment | added | Peter | So the first statement is at go-live but going down to two cores per server is perfectly fine according to VMWare if the response time is still OK (2nd statement) | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 5:53 | comment | added | Robert Lindgren | Because Microsoft wants to be able to say that if you are blow out guidelines, problems you see might be performance related. But depending on the actual usage on an environment those guidelines can be to high (or to low) | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 | comment | added | Peter | I get that but why mention minimum requirements at all | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 5:36 | history | answered | Robert Lindgren | CC BY-SA 3.0 |