network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | Apr 4 at 17:19 | |
| stats | profile views | 14 |
|
Jan 18 |
comment |
What are the typical reasons for modifying SharePoint web.config I do the same with my WCF bindings... good addition there |
|
Jan 12 |
comment |
Best practices of custom field types in SharePoint 2010 Note the question is NOT "How do I create custom field types?" |
|
Jan 12 |
comment |
Best practices of custom field types in SharePoint 2010 @Mikeconway Thanks for your help here... you should have added this as an answer and I could have marked it as accepted! |
|
Jan 11 |
comment |
Best practices of custom field types in SharePoint 2010 Apologies, I cleared it up and was more specific. I meant custom field types. Again - I apologize. |
|
Jan 10 |
comment |
What do I need to do in order to execute cmdlets (sharepoint 2010) that resolved my issue - you are a gentleman and a scholor... will mark as answer as soon as I can. |
|
Jan 3 |
comment |
How do you activate a feature on promotion? sorry yes, I meant deployment of WSP |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
How do I get machine name off of the SPContext indeed it was, thanks! |
|
Oct 10 |
comment |
Are their negatives to using the content type hub approach Particulars around management via feature. Answer below touches on this. |
|
Oct 6 |
comment |
Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong? Also... on "content type publishing" the correct metadata proxy is shown |
|
Oct 6 |
comment |
Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong? @Tim MDS = metadata service I wasn't looking in the ULS logs, I meant there was nothing in the content type sync error list. |
|
Oct 6 |
comment |
Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong? nothing in the error log |
|
Oct 3 |
comment |
in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML perfect thanks, marked as answer |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML So you are saying changing type and changing content types in any way when used in multiple list definitions then the update will not work properly (via CAML I mean)? |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML While I appreciate the information here (it is good), it's not really answering the question of why I would prefer one over the other. |
|
Sep 29 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level let us continue this discussion in chat |
|
Sep 29 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level Apologies for getting frusterated, I thought the same as your last post and was fiddling around with activation order and I still seem to have the same issue. It just cannot find the content type by any ID I pass it. Also, activating a feature by the ID in the feature manifest (via code) fails - saying no feature can be found. |
|
Sep 28 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level ......ok........ here you go: SPContentType cType = web.ContentTypes[new SPContentTypeId("0x0100CE2744E3BAEA4734B2333D043AA5DD2C")]; ALSO fails... and yes, the content type was created in the site collection I am passing as a parameter. |
|
Sep 28 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level I specified the following in the original question "I tried passing JUST the child ID, parent & child, and full (base, parent, child) ID" |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease let us continue this discussion in chat |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease In your post above, you say <Base><new (child)><and so on> In my list definition I have it <base><parent><child>. I created a new content type via VS and it also set up the ID in the format I mentioned I used. Maybe I am misunderstanding what you put forth, or maybe it was a typo? |
