227 reputation
210
bio website
location
age
visits member for 2 years, 10 months
seen Apr 4 '13 at 17:19

Oct
6
asked Are their negatives to using the content type hub approach
Oct
6
comment Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong?
Also... on "content type publishing" the correct metadata proxy is shown
Oct
6
comment Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong?
@Tim MDS = metadata service I wasn't looking in the ULS logs, I meant there was nothing in the content type sync error list.
Oct
6
comment Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong?
nothing in the error log
Oct
6
asked Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong?
Oct
3
comment in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML
perfect thanks, marked as answer
Oct
3
accepted in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML
Sep
30
comment in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML
So you are saying changing type and changing content types in any way when used in multiple list definitions then the update will not work properly (via CAML I mean)?
Sep
30
comment in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML
While I appreciate the information here (it is good), it's not really answering the question of why I would prefer one over the other.
Sep
29
asked in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML
Sep
29
revised Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level
added 328 characters in body; edited title
Sep
29
accepted Restricting access to certain out of the box SharePoint web services
Sep
29
comment Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level
let us continue this discussion in chat
Sep
29
comment Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level
Apologies for getting frusterated, I thought the same as your last post and was fiddling around with activation order and I still seem to have the same issue. It just cannot find the content type by any ID I pass it. Also, activating a feature by the ID in the feature manifest (via code) fails - saying no feature can be found.
Sep
28
comment Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level
......ok........ here you go: SPContentType cType = web.ContentTypes[new SPContentTypeId("0x0100CE2744E3BAEA4734B2333D043AA5DD2C")]; ALSO fails... and yes, the content type was created in the site collection I am passing as a parameter.
Sep
28
awarded  Commentator
Sep
28
comment Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level
I specified the following in the original question "I tried passing JUST the child ID, parent & child, and full (base, parent, child) ID"
Sep
28
asked Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level
Sep
27
comment Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease
let us continue this discussion in chat
Sep
27
comment Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease
In your post above, you say <Base><new (child)><and so on> In my list definition I have it <base><parent><child>. I created a new content type via VS and it also set up the ID in the format I mentioned I used. Maybe I am misunderstanding what you put forth, or maybe it was a typo?