network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 8 months |
| seen | Apr 4 at 17:19 | |
| stats | profile views | 14 |
|
Oct 6 |
comment |
Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong? nothing in the error log |
|
Oct 6 |
asked | Content type not showing up after publishing to hub - what am I doing wrong? |
|
Oct 3 |
comment |
in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML perfect thanks, marked as answer |
|
Oct 3 |
accepted | in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML So you are saying changing type and changing content types in any way when used in multiple list definitions then the update will not work properly (via CAML I mean)? |
|
Sep 30 |
comment |
in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML While I appreciate the information here (it is good), it's not really answering the question of why I would prefer one over the other. |
|
Sep 29 |
asked | in SharePoint 2010 why should I prefer to update content types in feature receivers rather than CAML |
|
Sep 29 |
revised |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level added 328 characters in body; edited title |
|
Sep 29 |
accepted | Restricting access to certain out of the box SharePoint web services |
|
Sep 29 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level let us continue this discussion in chat |
|
Sep 29 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level Apologies for getting frusterated, I thought the same as your last post and was fiddling around with activation order and I still seem to have the same issue. It just cannot find the content type by any ID I pass it. Also, activating a feature by the ID in the feature manifest (via code) fails - saying no feature can be found. |
|
Sep 28 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level ......ok........ here you go: SPContentType cType = web.ContentTypes[new SPContentTypeId("0x0100CE2744E3BAEA4734B2333D043AA5DD2C")]; ALSO fails... and yes, the content type was created in the site collection I am passing as a parameter. |
|
Sep 28 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Sep 28 |
comment |
Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level I specified the following in the original question "I tried passing JUST the child ID, parent & child, and full (base, parent, child) ID" |
|
Sep 28 |
asked | Updating a content type via feature receiver at the list definition level |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease let us continue this discussion in chat |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease In your post above, you say <Base><new (child)><and so on> In my list definition I have it <base><parent><child>. I created a new content type via VS and it also set up the ID in the format I mentioned I used. Maybe I am misunderstanding what you put forth, or maybe it was a typo? |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease this last part is very good information - good to know I don't always have to define it in full. |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease For a new list definition content type (parent being another custom content type) can I just generate my own GUID and utilize it for the new child (while following the format you mentioned for the parent appended?) |
|
Sep 27 |
accepted | Content type ID management - how do I snag parent ID's with ease |
