Tag Info

New answers tagged

3

Yes It shares this quality as SharePoint online also has lookup column threshold of 8. https://community.office365.com/en-us/f/148/t/11914


0

Using CSS or CSR or Calculated Columns; I answered this in detail 2 weeks ago: How to Truncate a multiline column in a SharePoint List 2013


0

I've not encountered this issue before, but I don't think I've encountered a list with over 50 public views either. You may also want to consider just using either a content query web part or search webpart and customize your view from there. You then have flexibility in using XSLT or display templates. You can still link back to the actual calendar list ...


0

It seems that the List View Web Part is limited to 50 views appearing in the Selected View drop-down field. See the Tech Net discussion thread Dashboard (web part) pages - cannot add view to web part and also see Not all views being displayed in my web part. It sounds like this limit is not well-documented, though. You can use the Edit the current view to ...


0

I have the same issue in Sharepoint 2013 I guess. This is the situation. You create a page that shows the web part of a list. If you edit the web part, you get the option to select another list view from a drop-down menu titled 'Selected View'. Normally this works fine, but if you have too many list views on the same list, the drop-down menu only shows a ...


1

Just wanted to add to this... BEWARE... So the idea is sound.. Index the Modified date then for the view, only show N number of days that will return < 5000 items. Modified (Indexed) >= [Today]-90 The problem is that the moment you add a Formula into your view's filter box, that view will no longer show up for Alerts Subscriptions. Modified ...


0

var linkItem = new SPFieldUrlValue(listItem["URL"].ToString()); SPFieldUrlValue value = new SPFieldUrlValue(linkItem.Description.ToString().Trim()); string URL = value.Url;


0

It looks like this is a known issue with various versions of SharePoint when you try to filter by a workflow status. Instead of filtering by the string Complete or In Progress, etc. in the Filter section of the view, you'll need to use the integer value for the workflow string in the Filter section. Here are workflow status integer values: NotStarted = 0 ...


0

Personally, I would get the user with Full Control (or the site admins), to create themselves a private view, as opposed to a public one. Within the public view, items will be filtered using the [ME] attribute, whereas you can then specify the parameters of the private/personal view you have created. Additionally, within the general permission levels of all ...


1

Updated Answer after question was updated with more understanding. Well as you have said that we can remove the Quick Edit link via list setting in Advance Settings option, but unfortunately that hides link for all users irrespective of admin or not. So I doubt you have any OOB solution which will take care of your requirement. You need some custom ...


3

You have to add two permission levels on the site. One level needs Add Items and View Items permissions. The other level needs View Items. Then assign the level to two different groups and it is done. User permissions and permission levels in SharePoint 2013 If you want to hide the Edit button in the quick edit mode, I would suggest you to use Javascript ...


3

Then in your list, you would want to make sure that the permissions are set so that only your administrators have Contribute, Edit, or Full Control access and everyone else has Read. This can be found by going to the List tab and selecting List Settings and clicking on Permissions for this list. You might have to break permissions inheritance and set ...


3

This should do it: Download jQuery and save it to /SiteAssets/ Create a JavaScript file named comma-break.js and save it in /SiteAssets/ with the contents of: $(document).ready(function () { var str = $('.ms-listviewtable').html(); //; $('.ms-listviewtable').html(str.replace(new RegExp(", ", "g"), ",</br>")); }); Add a Content Editor ...


0

Hi I believe you have to create a separate function for the DispForm.aspx. This form is rendered differently than the other two (NewForm and EditForm). Just a question though, where will you use the id of the field or what will you do to it?


2

Actually, it doesn't matter that much if the end result is one item, a dozen or 4999. The SQL database must have fewer than 5000 items in the subset to be returned by the first filtering operation in the query to avoid table lock escalation. In your case, if the requirements don't change, you're fine, because the database shall filter documents by folder ...


3

From experience : As stated by others, you can have a view that returns more than the threshold (default 5000). There are three things that can be used to achieve this : Paging. Flat view with no filer/grouping/total. Filter/Grouping/Total, but you cannot use one of those on columns that are not indexed. If you need to do so, do it before reaching the ...


3

Posted comment answering the question The limitation is on page views. 1 page view can max contain 5000 items. If you have 150 items per page view, you should be fine.


1

In past I notice when a client had more then 5000 documents with many attachments 1. The performance was so slow 2. It was hard to navigate the right document for users. 3. For some reason the MS SQL Index was broken and items were not coming up search terms. it was just like asking for trouble. Its an issue your better of splitting it into folders or ...


1

It has been a while since I did this. I agree with taking out the $Resource part. And yes Formulas use DisplayName as references, I have never used the ID in the FieldRefs And try it with an existing field first <Field> ... <Formula>=Title</Formula> <FieldRefs> <FieldRef Name="Title" /> </FieldRefs> </Field> ...


1

First, I would remove the "$Resources" part in the Display Name of your definitions (if you don't use resource files). Check this question : How can I provision a list with a calculated field? (there is a comment saying that InternalNames are required, and there is this link http://www.hekstra.org/how-to-deploy-a-calculated-field/ saying that Site Column = ...


0

Okay, I got it: only text and primitive types are allowed to be lookuped by standard mechanism. You should write your own "fixer" to achieve needed behaviour.


0

Can't you just set order by ID desc in view? And set the number of returning values to 5000. Thus you'll get last 5000 items.


1

Change the pagination of list views to how you want and copy the changed URL. The next time you paste this URL, you'll see your pagination persisted. Some background info on how this works: If you notice the URL when you change the page of the list view, you'll notice something like #InplviewHash appended. This is because in SP 2013, inplview.js handles ...


1

I would create 3 different views with filters: View1 to display 1 to 35 items View2 to display 36 to 70 items View3 to display 71 to 100 items Add webparts to each column and select each webpart properties to display View1, View2 and View3. Tada...



Top 50 recent answers are included