SharePoint Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for SharePoint enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are the differences between extending a web app and adding a host header then adding alternate access mappings in SharePoint 2010? My understanding is that , if you are using different authentication scheme for different zones , then extending a web app. If you would like to access the same web apps but with different URL for different zones ,using adding a host header then adding alternate access mappings. Please feel free to correct me if I got it complete wrong.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Extending the application allows you to view over a number of different hosts (using AAM) but more importantly allows you to specify a different authentication provider and security settings.

share|improve this answer
Good answer. e.g. if you wanted to extend a Web application for external usage you might choose to use FBA as opposed to Windows authentication. – Benjamin J Athawes Jan 20 '11 at 13:04

See the following answered question for more info on this.

Whats the difference between host headers and alternate access mappings?

SPDoctor has a very good explanation on the difference between the 2 methods for managing IIS and host headers for your SharePoint server. It is always best to let SharePoint handling IIS by extending the web application instead of manually creating host headers and alternate access mappings.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.