SharePoint Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for SharePoint enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there any drawback of applying NTFS compression on IIS and Moss/Sharepoint (version 2007 and 2010) log files ?

I guess this won't be an issue. There will be a slight CPU overhead, but a great reduction of file used space (I'm expecting to divide by 4 the log files) and even a better file i/o performances (less data to write).

Am I right ?

I'd appreciate your feedbacks.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

In SharePoint 2010, this is done automatically (if you're referring to the ULS logs). In SharePoint 2007, I don't see a downside except for the slight CPU overhead which should be negligible on a modern CPU.

share|improve this answer
Ok, i'll try to compress the log files on preproduction farm at first. Thanks – Steve B Jun 1 '12 at 7:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.