SharePoint Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for SharePoint enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a way to take a Published Publishing Page offline such that it isn't accessible to anonymous users of a WCM website?

If you un-publish, the page's most recent version will still be accessible.

I'd rather avoid breaking permission inheritance of possible.

Another option is to have an 'archive' library with the page content types associated, and move the page there.

SharePoint Server 2010, by the way.

Anyone figured out any other way?

EDIT: In my particular example, I just noticed there was only one page in the sub site, so it made sense just to revoke anonymous access for that subsite. But I would still like to know how to do this for a page, if it all possible without breaking permissions inheritance.

share|improve this question
can't you play with publishing dates ? – Steve B Jan 20 '12 at 8:47
Are you sure this is correct (or am I missing something)? I did some testing with OOTB Article Page in Pages library (version on, check in/out, approval on and off, anonymous access set to View Items ). I have created several major versions of Article Page. When I used OOTB Unpublish this version anonymous user couldn't see Article Page anymore. – Vedran Rasol Jan 20 '12 at 13:41
Unpublish will definitely make the page not visible for anonymous users. – Jussi Palo Jan 24 '12 at 20:39
But won't it keep the most recent major version in the history? Let me try it now... – James Love Jan 24 '12 at 20:41
Yep that worked. Not sure why, see my comment on the accepted answer. – James Love Jan 24 '12 at 20:49
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Steve B, this is my experience as well.

Unpublish should do the trick.

share|improve this answer
Ok that worked, but defies logic. The previous Major version remains in the document's history, but remains inaccessible to anonymous users? – James Love Jan 24 '12 at 20:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.