SharePoint Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for SharePoint enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that in part, the answer is "it depends." But are hundreds manageable? Thousands? Yes, space is cheap. But what are the drawbacks to letting users create new webs sites that could result in thousands of different pages?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

It's definitely an "it depends" question. I will say the numbers you are throwing out are well within ( several orders of magnitude) the boundary guidelines provided by Microsoft:

If you're concerned about sprawl put some sort of site provisioning/de-provisioning capability in place. It could be as simple as a form that they have to fill out to request a new site tied to a workflow that optionally goes thru an approval process, creates the approved sites and then de-provisions it after some set time...basically notifying the requestor that the site is going to be de-provisioned and giving them an opportunity to extend it's life...if they don't request an extension then it goes bye-bye. Without something along those lines then I would share your concern that it will likely grow out of control.

share|improve this answer
I really expencted more discussion about this since there are warnings everywhere about letting the sites grow out of hand. But thank you for your response. – Mark SQLDev Aug 9 '11 at 15:03
Agreed...I would have expected more folks to chime in. – Rob D'Oria Aug 9 '11 at 15:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.